Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Farr, Sr. v. Ponthler et al
as 9:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Willie Ned Farr, Sr.
Defendant:
Courtney Tracy Ponthler, Robert J. Burby, Jessie C. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Renfrew v. Davis
as 4:2019cv01137
Petitioner:
Ned Carlos Renfrew
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeremy Ned v. Dallas Jones, et al
as 18-40559
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY HEATH NED
Respondent - Appellee:
DALLAS JONES, Warden of FCC Beaumont Medium and J. CASTANEDA, Warden of FCI Big Springs
Ned v. United States of America
as 7:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Heath Ned
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Deshazo v. College Station Police Department et al DO NOT DOCKET IN (member case number). CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER (lead case number 4:18cv334).
as 4:2018cv00356
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Deshazo
Defendant:
College Station Police Department, Brazos County District Attorney Office, 272nd District Court/ Brazos County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deshazo v. College Station Police Department et al
as 4:2018cv00334
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Deshazo
Defendant:
College Station Police Department, Brazos County District Attorney Office, 272nd District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tennyson v. State Alcorn County et al
as 1:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Billy Tennyson, Jr.
Defendant:
State Alcorn County, Pounds and Ned Cregean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ned v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00127
Petitioner:
Jeremy Ned
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ned v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv00008
Petitioner:
Jeremy Ned
Respondent:
Dallas Jones and J Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ned v. Warden FCI Loretto et al
as 1:2016cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ned
Defendant:
Warden FCI Loretto, J Miller, S Eckenrode and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
