Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Clark et al v. Village of Enon et al
as 3:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Larry Ned Clark and Mary Kathryn Clark
Defendant:
Village of Enon, Clifford Vernon and Troy Callahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holtmann et al v. DPL, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00173
Defendant:
Dolphin Sub, Inc., Paul M. Barbas, General Lester L. Lyles and others
Petitioner:
Patrick Nichting and Stephen Kubiak
Plaintiff:
Catherine P. Holtmann and Ralph B. Holtmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichting v. DPL Inc, et al.
as 3:2011cv00148
Defendant:
Dolphin Sub, Inc., Paul M. Barbas, Pamela B. Morris and others
Petitioner:
Ralph B. Holtmann, Catherine P. Holtmann and Stephen Kubiak
Plaintiff:
Patrick Nichting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kubiak v. Barbas et al
as 3:2011cv00141
Defendant:
The AES Corporation, Barbara S. Graham, Pamela B. Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Kubiak, Catherine P. Holtmann, Patrick Nichting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Radcliffe v. Robinson et al
as 2:2010cv00839
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Radcliffe
Defendant:
Monte Robinson, Jeff Happ, City of Columbus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fryer v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2010cv00062
Plaintiff:
John W. Fryer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Ned O. Morrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Gessic v. Village of Bentleyville et al
as 1:2007cv03201
Plaintiff:
Stephen Scott Gessic
Defendant:
Village of Bentleyville, Harvey Bruner, Debbie Alexlrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown, et al v. Custom Coach Corpora, et al
as 2:2001cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ned Brown, Joyce NMI Brown and Exhibit Concepts Inc
Counter Claimant:
Custom Coach Corpora and Special Vehicles Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Advanced Bus Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
