Cases filed in Pennsylvania
LITMAN et al v. GUCKIN et al
as 2:2023cv01889
Plaintiff: CELIA LITMAN, DONALD LITMAN, ARTHUR LITMAN and others
Defendant: JENNIFER GUCKIN and TOWAMENCIN TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Gray Jr. v. Zook et al
as 1:2020cv01366
Defendant: James Iverson, Jeremiah D. Zook, Stephen D. Kulla and others
Plaintiff: Wayne A. Gray Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. Mooney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01273
Plaintiff: Lamont Pugh
Defendant: Mr. Grohowski, C.O. Moore, Central Office Special Needs Psychiatric Review Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00834
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CITIBANK, N.A. v. INFINITE CARE, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03338
Plaintiff: CITIBANK, N.A.
Defendant: INFINITE CARE, INC. , INFINITE SPECIAL NEEDS INCORPORATED and LUIS LONDONO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
CAVE SYSTEMS, INC. v. FOSTER et al
as 5:2013cv00075
Plaintiff: CAVE SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant: PHILLIP C. FOSTER , RONALD G. SCHLEGEL and SUPPLY NEEDS, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
NEEDS v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv90383
Plaintiff: CHARLES H. NEEDS and CHARLES H. NEEDS
Defendant: A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Shilinski v. Edwin A. Abrahamsen & Associates, P.C. et al
as 3:2009cv00054
Plaintiff: Daniel J. Shilinski
Defendant: Edwin A. Abrahamsen & Assocaites, P.C., Edwin A. Abrahamsen, Heather Woodruff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?