Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv51171
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NEIL BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS, JR. v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv08877
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT NEIL BROOKS, JR.
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns v. Milstead et al
as 2:2016cv03343
Plaintiff:
Erin Burns
Defendant:
Frank Milstead, Arizona, State of, Orion Jeffrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suenos LLC v. Diane Goldman, et al
as 13-17616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUENOS LLC, an Illinois limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANE GOLDMAN, a New Jersey individual, LAWYERS TITLE OF ARIZONA INCORPORATED, an Arizona corporation, as successor-in-interest to Land America Capital Title Company, a Virginia corporation, NEIL BROOKS and others
Suenos LLC v. Diane Goldman, et al
as 13-17566
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SUENOS LLC, an Illinois limited liability company
Defendant:
DIANE GOLDMAN, a New Jersey individual
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWYERS TITLE OF ARIZONA INCORPORATED, an Arizona corporation, as successor-in-interest to Land America Capital Title Company, a Virginia corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
NEIL BROOKS
Suenos, LLC v. Goldman et al
as 2:2010cv01034
Plaintiff:
Suenos, LLC
Defendant:
Diane Goldman , Lawyers Title of Arizona, Inc. , Gail Dacey and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Suenos, LLC v. Goldman et al
as 1:2010cv00934
Plaintiff:
Suenos, LLC
Defendant:
Diane Goldman, Lawyers Title of Arizona, Inc., Gail Dacey and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
