Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Modern Telecom Systems Inc LLC v. Lenovo Group Limited et al
as 8:2014cv01266
3Rd Party Defendant:
Juno Online Services, Inc. and NETZERO, INC.
Counter Defendant:
Modern Telecom Systems LLC
Counter Claimant:
Lenovo (United States) Inc
Defendant:
Lenovo Group Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Modern Telecom Systems LLC v. Juno Online Services Inc et al
as 8:2014cv00348
Defendant:
Juno Online Services, Inc. and Netzero, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Plaintiff:
Modern Telecom Systems LLC
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
William E Thomson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ziplink, Inc. v. NetZero, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01395
Plaintiff:
Ziplink, Inc.
Defendant:
NetZero, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Unified Messaging Solutions, LLC v. United Online, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Unified Messaging Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
United Online, Inc. , Juno Online Services, Inc. , NetZero, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Griffin Technology Holdings Inc. v. NetZero, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01321
Plaintiff:
Griffin Technology Holdings Inc.
Defendant:
NetZero, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
E-Contact Technologies, LLC v. United Online, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00086
Plaintiff:
E-Contact Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
United Online, Inc. , United Online Web Services, Inc. , United Online Advertising Network, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MYMAIL LTD V AMERICA ONLINE
as 06-1147
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
EARTHLINK, INC., JUNO ONLINE SERVICES, INC., NETBRANDS, INC. and others
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant:
MYMAIL, LTD., MYMAIL, LTD. and MYMAIL, LTD.
Defendant-Appellee:
PRODIGY COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, SBC INTERNET SERVICES, INC., SOUTHWESTERN BELL INTERNET SERVICES, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
