Cases 1 - 10 of 906
Kathleen Dorsett v. Warden New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1881
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN M. DORSETT
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Jermaine Vaughn v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1822
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE VAUGHN
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
MURRAY-BEY v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv05738
Plaintiff:
DANNY-R: MURRAY-BEY
Defendant:
RODERICK JONES and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLASEN v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv05693
Plaintiff:
HECTOR LUIS CLASEN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, HUDSON COUNTY JAIL OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-10 and KINTOCK GROUP MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITROS v. CASTILLO/MARR et al
as 1:2024cv05420
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
MELISSA CASTILLO/MARR, A. M. and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE BUENA BARRACKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Sheppard v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1697
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SHEPPARD
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
LYGA v. PURCIELLO et al
as 2:2024cv04943
Plaintiff:
MIKE LYGA
Defendant:
STEVEN PURCIELLO and THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Biddle v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1661
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. BIDDLE
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
MITROS v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2024cv04759
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, ANTHONY JOHN MITROS, JR., SANDRA SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralph BakerIn re: Ralph Baker
as 24-1633
Petitioner:
In re: RALPH BAKER
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and MICHAEL E. FARBIARZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
