Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hester v. Lea County Correctional Facility (GEO Group) Staff et al
as 2:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Wesley Dean Hester
Defendant:
Lea County Correctional Facility (GEO Group) Staff, New Mexico Corrections Department, Wexford Health Services and Staff Thereof and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hoffman v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Hoffman
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan Grisham, The State of New Mexico Governor, Alisha Tafoya Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Haywood v. New Mexico Governor, et al
as 23-2016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERICA D. HAYWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO GOVERNOR, NEW MEXICO ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW MEXICO CORRECTIONS DEPT. DIRECTORS and others
Haywood v. New Mexico Governor et al
as 1:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Erica D. Haywood
Defendant:
New Mexico Governor, New Mexico Attorney General, New Mexico Corrections Dept. Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2021cv00864
Plaintiff:
Donald Sharp and Donald Thomas Sharp
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, New Mexico Governors Office and Michelle Lujan Grisham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2021cv00839
Plaintiff:
Donald Sharp and Donald Thomas Sharp
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan Grisham and New Mexico Governor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Firewood, et al v. Martinez, et al
as 15-2107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOS REYES FIREWOOD and PABLO REYES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSANA MARTINEZ, State of New Mexico's Governor, HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT (ISD) PERSONNEL, BETSY SALCEDO and others
Muniz v. Cavazos, et al
as 07-2054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK M. MUNIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN CAVAZOS, NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF NEW MEXICO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
