Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 384
Knight v. New York State Department of C
as 22-964
Plaintiff / Appellee: Hugh Knight, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Shannon Dickinson, on behalf of themselves and all otehrs similarly situated
Plaintiff: Wayne Stewart, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant: New York State Department of Corrections, a public entity, Carl Koenigsmann, MD, Susan Mueller, MD and others
Defendant / Appellant: Chung Lee, MD and Albert Acrish, NP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-932
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Green Haven Prison Preparatve v. New York State Department of C
as 22-878
Plaintiff / Appellant: Yohannes Johnson, individually, As Clerk of Green Haven Prison Preparative Meeting, Gregory Thompson, individually, As Treasurer of Bulls Head-OswegoMonthly Meeting, Nine Partners Quarterly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends, an unincorporated association and others
Defendant / Appellee: New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony Annucci, in his capacity as Acting Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Jeff McKoy, in his capacity as the Deputy Commissioner for Program Services of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Bonet v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 1:2022cv00300
Plaintiff: Michelle Nicole Bonet
Defendant: New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, A. Annucci, D. Venettozzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonet v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03023
Plaintiff: Michelle Nicole Bonet
Defendant: New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orsaio v. New York State Department of C
as 22-596
Plaintiff / Appellant: Regina Orsaio
Defendant / Appellee: New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Defendant: Anthony Annucci, Acting Commissioner of DOCCS, Ronald Hess, Bureau Chief and Susan Hrovat, Senior Parole Officer
Mallet v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01604
Plaintiff: Antonio Mallet
Defendant: New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Cuomo
as 22-395
Plaintiff / Appellant: Towsun Coleman and Towaun Coleman
Defendant / Appellee: Durkin, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, FKA Lieutenant Derkin, Hutti, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correction Facility, King, Correctional Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Defendant: Andrew Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, Anthony Annucci, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervison, Steven Racette, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Talukder v. State of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01452
Plaintiff: M.D. A. Talukder
Defendant: STATE OF NEW YORK, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI and others
Interested Party: New York State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. NYS Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv06025
Plaintiff: Ronald Muhammad
Defendant: New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, NYS Department of Corrections, Amy Titus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?