Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Newsome v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv14595
Plaintiff:
Charla Newsome
Defendant:
AFAM Concept Inc., Avlon Industries Inc, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newsome v. Revlon Inc et al
as 1:2023cv08647
Plaintiff:
Annie Newsome
Defendant:
Revlon Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norman v. Newsome et al
as 1:2023cv01938
Plaintiff:
Gary Norman
Defendant:
G. Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falbe v. Municipal et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Robert Reed Falbe, III
Defendant:
Municipal, Newsom, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv05651
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cintron, Beecham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Gondek et al
as 1:2021cv06542
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
E. Gondek, A. McGee, Y. Tefledzhuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv01984
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Jesse Mays
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Det. Pokuta, J.D. Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
