Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 24-1334
Plaintiff: CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant: NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 23-1836
Plaintiff / Appellee: CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant: NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Nexus Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00016
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Defendant: Nexus Services, Inc., Richard Moore, Micheal Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
RLI Insurance Company v. Nexus Services, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2253
Defendant / Appellant: LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., HOMES BY NEXUS, INC. and NEXUS SERVICES, INC.
Intervenor Defendant: GERSON CASTRO SEGEDA, MARCELINO RAMIREZ-SANCHEZ, CESAR AUGUSTO GRAMAJO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: RLI INSURANCE COMPANY
Statewide Bonding, Inc., et al v. DHS, et al
as 19-5364
Plaintiff / Appellant: Statewide Bonding, Inc., Mike Donovan, Nexus Services, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Kirstjen M. Nielsen, in her individual capacity, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), United States Department of Homeland Security, "DHS" and others
Statewide Bonding, Inc., et al v. DHS, et al
as 19-5342
Plaintiff / Appellant: Statewide Bonding, Inc., Mike Donovan, Nexus Services, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Chad F. Wolf, in his individual capacity as Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Matthew T. Albence, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Statewide Bonding, Inc., et al v. DHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5178
Plaintiff / Appellant: Statewide Bonding, Inc., Mike Donovan, Nexus Services, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE, Jody M. Prescott, in his official capacity as Associate Legal Advisor, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Ronald D. Vitiello, in his individual and official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and others
STATEWIDE BONDING, INC et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02519
Plaintiff: BIG MARCO INSURANCE AND BONDING SERVICES, LLC, MIKE DONOVAN, STATEWIDE BONDING, INC and others
Defendant: JODY M. PRESCOTT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv06471
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State Of Connecticut, State of New York and others
Defendant: Jefferson B. Sessions III and United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae: Joseph Crowley, Yvette D. Clarke, Brian Higgins and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Nexus Services, Inc. and Libre by Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU v. NEXUS SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv02238
Petitioner: CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Respondent: NEXUS SERVICES, INC. and LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?