Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Jaycox v. Colleor et al
as 2:2025cv00134
Plaintiff:
Floyd Junior Jaycox
Defendant:
UTMB Health Services, NFN Pacheco, NFN Schiwart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birdo v. Abbott et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Birdo
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Brian Collier, Hon Elizabeth Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Miller et al
as 5:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Allen Murray
Defendant:
NFN Miller, NFN Parker, T.D.C.J. Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz v. Miller
as 5:2022cv00109
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent:
NFN Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Robertson et al
as 5:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Royal Clark Robertson
Defendant:
Laticia Robertson, Mrs. Tina Witfield, NFN Stove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Straughn et al
as 5:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Nelson
Defendant:
Captain NFN Straughn, Wesley Hendrix, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Miller et al
as 5:2021cv00242
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Nelson
Defendant:
Warden NFN Miller, Lieutenant NFN Marenelrena, Sgt NFN Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyce Cook v. Bryan Collier, et al
as 20-10587
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORES, Correctional Officer, BLACKWELL, Regional Director, JOHN DOE, Kitchen Personnel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REYCE JANON COOK
Mallard v. Parr et al
as 9:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
Chansler Depaul Mallard
Defendant:
NFN Morea, NFN Parker, NFN Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallard v. Parr et al
as 2:2020cv00040
Plaintiff:
Chansler Depaul Mallard
Defendant:
NFN Morea, NFN Parker, NFN Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
