Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Farmer v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv03033
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Corrections Corporation of America, Sam Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Richey R. Farmer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. McKinley, et al.
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Hernandez
Defendant:
James McKinley, James Boparao, Quintin Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03284
Plaintiff:
Donzell A. Jones
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemmich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowers v. Rogers, et al
as 21-3232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FAHEEM BOWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMUEL ROGERS, ROEMICH, SPELLMAN and others
Bowers v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03224
Plaintiff:
Faheem L. Bowers
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Petitioner:
Donzell A. Jones, Antonio B. Flemming and Emmanuel J. Sanders
Interested Party:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03197
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Niecko v. Jaques, et al
as 19-1443
Respondent / Appellee:
TERRY JAQUES and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ALAN NIECKO
Niecko v. Hansen et al
as 1:2019cv00071
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Niecko and Christopher Alan Niecko
Respondent:
Mathew Hansen
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Niecko v. Munsinger et al
as 1:2018cv02913
Defendant:
Jennifer Melton, Stephen M. Munsinger, Michelle Weaver and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Niecko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jody Carr v. Carlyn, et al
as 17-35317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JODY R.O. CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLYN, HIGGENS, Sgt., D. W. YORDY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
