Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 108
Benjamin Geer, Jr. v. Joseph Nish, et al
as 11-1212
Plaintiff - Appellant: BENJAMIN R. GEER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH P. NISH and ATTY GEN PA
Debtor - Appellee: DA CRAWFORD
Johnakin v. Nish et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00157
Petitioner: Wayne A. Johnakin
Respondent: Joseph P. Nish, The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tepong v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv02656
Plaintiff: Lor Tepong
Defendant: Michael P Murphy, S.A. Nezezon, D Cadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Ash v. Joseph Nish, et al
as 10-4620
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODNEY ASH
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH NISH, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
ANDERSON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv05604
Plaintiff: JOSH LEE ANDERSON
Defendant: JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, DAVID A. VARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Ascenzi v. Joe Nish, et al
as 10-4101
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL J. ASCENZI
Defendant - Appellee: JOE NISH and ATTY GEN PA
SIMMONS v. NISH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv04934
Petitioner: ROBERT E. SIMMONS
Respondent: NISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNAKIN v. NISH et al
as 2:2010cv01699
Petitioner: WAYNE JOHNAKIN
Respondent: JOSEPH P. NISH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. Nish We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00654
Petitioner: Robert E Simmons
Respondent: Nish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2010cv00584
Petitioner: Eugene L Harrison
Respondent: Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Daniel Dragwa, Joseph Nish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?