Cases 1 - 10 of 61
MC NISH v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2013cv00892
Plaintiff:
SHACOY MC NISH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Finley v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv02194
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Finley
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, SCI Waymart, Patrick Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
McCain v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv00789
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Keri Moore, James C. Barnacle and others
Plaintiff:
John McCain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Nish et al
as 1:2012cv00321
Plaintiff:
Muwsa Green
Defendant:
Joseph P. Nish, Walter Robbins, Keri Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnakin v. Andidora et al
as 1:2011cv02393
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Johnakin
Defendant:
Debra Andidora, Ina Presavento, Shari Dulske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. NISH et al
as 2:2011cv00933
Petitioner:
ROGER LEE THOMAS
Respondent:
JOSEPH NISH and WILLIAM RYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNAKIN v. NISH et al
as 2:2011cv03503
Petitioner:
WAYNE A. JOHNAKIN
Respondent:
JOSEPH P. NISH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Nish
as 1:2011cv00642
Petitioner:
George J. Taylor, III
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and Joseph P. Nish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Nish et al
as 1:2011cv00599
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Thomas
Respondent:
Joseph Nish and William Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arlotta v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 3:2011cv00425
Petitioner:
Joseph Arlotta
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, Joseph P. Nish and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
