Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NLMK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC v. ASCENT INDUSTRIES CO.
as 2:2023cv00729
Defendant:
ASCENT INDUSTRIES CO. a corporation formerly known as SYNALLOY CORPORATION doing business as BRISTOL METALS, LLC and SYNALLOY CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
NLMK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NLMK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC v. TOTEM STEEL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2022cv01644
Plaintiff:
NLMK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
Defendant:
TOTEM STEEL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
NLMK Pennsylvania, LLC v. US
as 22-1448
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NLMK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Petitioner / Appellant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NLMK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC et al v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv00273
Plaintiff:
NLMK INDIANA, LLC and NLMK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NLMK USA, INC et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00577
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
NLMK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC, SHARON COATING, LLC and NLMK USA, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
NLMK USA, INC et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv00209
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
NLMK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC, SHARON COATING, LLC and NLMK USA, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
NLMK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC v. KEN GRECO COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00296
Plaintiff:
NLMK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC
Defendant:
KEN GRECO COMPANY, INC. and KENNETH J. GRECO, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
