Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Janda v. Unknown Parties
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff: Ronald Janda
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORTESE, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01250
Plaintiff: JOHN A. CORTESE, JR.
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and US SSA USAO NOTICE ONLY PARTY TO ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hernandez v. RxC Acquisition Company et al
as 2:2023cv02154
Plaintiff: Donna Hernandez
Defendant: RxC Acquisition Company and UNKNOWN PARTIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
MEINERT v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv01930
Plaintiff: ROBERT EARL MEINERT
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
BENTON v. RANSOM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03818
Petitioner: Lamar benton
Respondent: kevin ransom, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant: DA - Philadelphia County Notice Only Party to Accept Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHEARER v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv01550
Plaintiff: SUSAN COLLEEN SHEARER
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
CRESSLEY v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv01465
Plaintiff: JORDAN C. CRESSLEY and JORDAN M. CRESSLEY
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
HARTMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
as 1:2023cv00233
Plaintiff: BRIAN L. HARTMAN
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
GRIBSCHAW v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv02987
Plaintiff: DAVID GRIBSCHAW
Defendant: LAUREL HARRY, TAMMY FERGUSON, ANN VERYYALA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv01369
Plaintiff: LISA S. ROBERTS
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?