Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Noel Thomas v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 26-10890
Plaintiff:
NOEL THOMAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, WALMART, INC., NDC ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Noel Thomas v. Wal-Mart Inc., et al
as 25-14122
Plaintiff:
NOEL THOMAS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., KEVIN BOLEN, LISSET CHAO and others
Edward Noel Thomas v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 2:2025cv06950
Petitioner:
Edward Noel Thomas
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Noel Thomas v. Pat Horn
as 2:2024cv07051
Respondent:
Pat Horn
Petitioner:
Edward Noel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Thomas v. Horn
as 1:2024cv00926
Respondent:
Pat Horn
Petitioner:
Edward Noel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Thomas v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2024cv01691
Petitioner:
Edward Noel Thomas
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Thomas v. Pfeiffer
as 1:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
Edward Noel Thomas
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noel Thomas v. North Carolina Mutual Insurance Life Insurance Co., et al
as 23-12428
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOEL THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA MUTUAL INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE, MICHAEL L. LAWRENCE, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Noel Thomas v. North Carolina Mutual Ins., et al
as 20-10318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOEL THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSTY SMITH, Consumer Specialist ADOI, Consumer Services, NORTH CAROLINA MUTUAL INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
