Cases 1 - 10 of 23
NOLE v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2023cv03374
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN NOLE
Defendant:
TYRELL ANTHONY MURRAY and DIDUDEB, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
NOLE v. STATE PAROLE BOARD OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2021cv00630
Respondent:
STATE PAROLE BOARD OF PHILA., TED JOHNSON, The District Attorney of the County of: Philadelphia and others
Plaintiff:
John Nole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. McCoy et al
as 3:2016cv01726
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Matthew McCoy, John E. Wetzel, Tabb Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00045
Plaintiff:
Jack Edwards
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, Becker Bachic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. McCoy et al
as 3:2015cv02174
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Matthew McCoy, Debra Rand, Marcia Noles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TABANSI v. NOLES et al
as 1:2015cv00245
Plaintiff:
SEHU KESSA SAA TABANSI
Defendant:
MARCIA NOLES and K. DITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
YUMIL PEREZ
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM, REV. PHIL MAUST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Religious Accomodation Committe, et al.
as 3:2014cv01776
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Bailey
Defendant:
Religious Accommodation Committee, John E Wezel, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
