Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CADMUS v. SUPERINTENDENT KENNETH CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
NORMAN CADMUS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT KENNETH CAMERON, DEPUTY DAVID J. CLOSE, DEPUTY KENNETH HOLLENBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman Cadmus v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 15-1648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CADMUS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CLARK, Lt., RHU, KILMER, Lt., RHU and others
In re: Norman Cadmu
as 15-1530
Petitioner:
In re: NORMAN CADMUS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Norman Cadmus v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 14-3547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CADMUS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, MR. CLARK, Lt., RHU and others
Cadmus v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
Norman Cadmus
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and SCI Coal Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cadmus v. Comm of PA et al
as 1:2012cv02335
Petitioner:
Norman Cadmus
Respondent:
Comm of PA and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cadmus v. Wentzel
as 1:2012cv02253
Plaintiff:
Norman Cadmus
Defendant:
John A. Wentzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman Cadmus v. Warden SCI Coal Township
as 10-3405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CADMUS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN SCI COAL TOWNSHIP, ATTY GEN PA and DA DAUPHIN
Norman Cadmus v. USA, et al
as 09-3117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CADMUS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Individually and in their official capacities and GEORGE W. BUSH, Individually and in their official capacities
Cadmus v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2008cv01273
Plaintiff:
Norman Cadmus
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and George W. Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
