Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Jordan v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 3:2024cv02824
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bryan Jordan
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Lee County Sheriff's Office, John E. Slaten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norris v. Stonebreaker
as 0:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
John Foster Norris
Respondent:
Captain Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marquez v. Cooper et al
as 6:2022cv04592
Plaintiff:
Emily Marquez
Defendant:
Jonathon Cooper, Brayden Leopold, Justice Rallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Norris v. Department of Corr.
as 0:2022cv00736
Petitioner:
John Foster Norris
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of, Department of Corr. and Warden, Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Dickens et al
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Charles M. Dickens, South Carolina Highway Patrol, South Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Norris v. Williams
as 8:2021cv03353
Petitioner:
Carnie Norris
Respondent:
Charles Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Baxter et al
as 5:2021cv00907
Defendant:
Jerry Adger, Karen Walto, Thomas Hallam and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Norris v. McMaster et al
as 8:2020cv04295
Plaintiff:
Carnie Norris, III
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, Bryant Stirling and Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna et al
as 0:2020cv04193
Defendant:
Mr. M. Chartier, Sergeant Francis, Capt. Pendergrass and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. McMaster et al
as 8:2020cv03717
Plaintiff:
Carnie Norris, III
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, Bryan Stirling and Henery McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
