Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Roberts v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC et al
as 5:2010cv00377
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC , Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC, and Bridgestone Americas, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Clyde Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michelin North America, Inc. et al v. M/V Pac Antares, et al
as 4:2008cv00070
Plaintiff:
Michelin North America, Inc., Michelin North America, Inc., Continental AG and others
Defendant:
M/V PAC ANTARES, Antares Marine Ltd., Pacific Carriers, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION et al v. STAMFORD TIRES AND WHEELS, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION, BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC and BFS BRANDS, LLC
Defendant:
STAMFORD TIRES AND WHEELS, INC. and STAMFORD TYRES CORPORATION LIMITED
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baldwin v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2007cv00315
Plaintiff:
Lois Jean Baldwin
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, American Investors, LLC, American Standard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LAWSON v. A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00194
Plaintiff:
KENNETH B. LAWSON and DELORES W. LAWSON
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., AMERICAN INVESTORS, LLC, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cross Claimant:
DURABLA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. and BORG-WARNER CORPORATION
Cross Defendant:
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., AQUA-CHEM, INC., BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MORGAN v. BORG-WARNER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv00056
Plaintiff:
PEGGY R. MORGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE/NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
