Cases 1 - 10 of 17
NORTON v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A NORTON
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and MAINE REVENUE SERVICE
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
NORTON v. BIDEN
as 1:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY NORTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Hunter et al
as 1:2022fp00123
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Wesner Compere
Defendant:
Paul Hunter, Alysa D. Erichs, David Michael McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Maini v. Town of Norton, et al.
as 1:2022cv10157
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Maini
Defendant:
Patrolman Joshua E. Archer, Patrolman Sean P. Mahoney, Patrolman John P. Worrel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kosta v. Masachusetts State Police
as 1:2019cv10605
Defendant:
Famingham Police, Revere Police Department, Kristen Bourdeau and others
Plaintiff:
Demetri Kosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clorite v. Somerset Access Television, et al
as 16-2281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN J. CLORITE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SOMERSET ACCESS TELEVISION, INC and THOMAS C. NORTON
Clorite v. Somerset Access Television et al
as 1:2014cv10399
Defendant:
Somerset Access Television, Inc. and Thomas C. Norton
Plaintiff:
John J. Clorite, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv12300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
