Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Canada Goose Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv00362
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", michelle eiffel, David Fruehauf and others
Plaintiff:
Canada Goose Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lloyd v. City of Berwyn et al
as 1:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Vibron Lloyd
Defendant:
City of Berwyn, Brad Mann, Nicholas Schavone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Schiavone et al
as 1:2016cv10014
Plaintiff:
Vibron Lloyd
Defendant:
Nicholas Schiavone, Brad Mann, Richard J. Novotny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theory v. City of Berwyn et al
as 1:2016cv07166
Plaintiff:
Ruben Theory
Defendant:
City of Berwyn , Kristina Ricchio , Mark Schwanderlik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atwater v. McLean County Orthopedics, Ltd. et al
as 1:2016cv01217
Defendant:
McLean County Orthopedics, Ltd., Joseph A. Novotny, Craig W. Carmichael and others
Plaintiff:
John Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez et al v. City of Berwyn et al
as 1:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Rodriguez and Teresita Perez
Defendant:
City of Berwyn , Jennifer Stillo, James Tricka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novotny v. Plexus Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05881
Plaintiff:
Edward Novotny
Defendant:
Plexus Inc., Luis Avina, Wayne Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Novotny v. Scott et al
as 3:2013cv03277
Plaintiff:
Michael Novotny
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Marie Durant, Cynthia Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
