Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Crandle v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
James Dlester Crandle
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley, Capt. Surles, Lt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Durborrow et al
as 3:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
S. Durborrow, B. Reed, Sergeant Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rumph v. Thomas et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Reggie Lee Rumph
Defendant:
Nurse Thomas and Nurse Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAPLES v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RANDY STAPLES
Defendant:
Commissioner TYRONE OLIVER, Warden SCOTT WILKES, WELLPATH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAPLES v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RANDY STAPLES
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, SCOTT WILKES, WELLPATH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leverett v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
James M. Leverett
Defendant:
Medical Director Rodgers, Nurse Taylor, Nurse Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plummer v. Toliver et al
as 2:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Brunswick Newspaper, Bill Gates, Sgt. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sean Plummer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWRENCE v. KEMP et al
as 5:2021cv00073
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR BOWEN, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, LIEUTENANT KING and others
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Al
as 2:2020cv00624
Defendant:
Eta Al, Nurse Greene, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Memnon et al
as 3:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michael Antwon Howard
Defendant:
Jacquez Memnon, James Johns, Joseph Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
