Cases 41 - 50 of 53
AGASAR et al v. NVR, INC.
as 2:2013cv06640
Plaintiff:
JAMES AGASAR and ELIZABETH MCGARRITY
Defendant:
NVR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MILLER et al v. NVR, INC. trading as RYAN HOMES
as 5:2013cv04624
Plaintiff:
BRUCE S. MILLER and BARBARA E. ESPOSITO
Defendant:
NVR, INC. trading as RYAN HOMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
NJTD4 INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC v. NVR, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv04466
Plaintiff:
NJTD4 INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
NVR, INC. and FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF PERKASIE
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
James Calender, et al v. NVR Inc
as 12-4132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES S. CALENDER and DIANE CALENDER, h/w
Defendant - Appellee:
NVR INC, trading as Ryan Homes
FLETCHER et al v. NVR, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv05211
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE FLETCHER and MAILE J. FLETCHER
Defendant:
NVR, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALENDER et al v. NVR, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv04277
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. CALENDER and DIANE CALENDER
Defendant:
NVR, INC. , JOHN DOES #1-10 and ABC COMPANIES #1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RAMOS v. NVR, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00674
Plaintiff:
SAULO RAMOS
Defendant:
NVR, INC., NV HOMES, L.P., NATELLI COMMUNITIES, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
KOWALSKI v. RYAN HOMES et al
as 2:2008cv00538
Plaintiff:
RYAN KOWALSKI
Defendant:
RYAN HOMES, NVR, INC and RYCON CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LINGO v. NVR, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04613
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LINGO
Defendant:
NVR, INC., PAUL C. SAVILLE, ROBERT PAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 A Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
