Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01971
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Crowder-Nadell v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00386
Plaintiff: Kayla Crowder-Nadell
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nadel v. Cardinal Financial
as 1:2021cv04374
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Nadel
Defendant: Cardinal Financial
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Nadel v. Legacy Ford of McDonough
as 1:2021cv04375
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Nadel
Defendant: Legacy Ford of McDonough
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Nadel v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv04867
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Brett Nadel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Nadel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00210
Defendant: Estelle Nadel, EZ Accounting & Tax Services, LLC and Andrea S. Nadel
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Nadel v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv04510
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Brett Nadel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jack Nadel, Inc. v. PCH Communications, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00857
Plaintiff: Jack Nadel, Inc.
Defendant: PCH Communications, LLC , PCH Holdings Group, LLC and Ahmad Islam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nadel v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
as 1:2010cv03674
Plaintiff: Bruce Nadel
Defendant: Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
as 1:2009mc00005
Defendant: Arthur Nadel, Scoop Capital LLC, Scoop Management Inc and others
Receiver: Burton W Wiand
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?