Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Nafis Abdullah-Malik v. Dan Rogers
as 24-6955
Defendant:
KELLY MARTIN, Deputy/Detention Officer, Union County Sheriff Office, his/her individual and official capacities, EDDIE CATHY, Sheriff, Union County, NC, in his individual and official capacities, BRADLEY PURSER, Sergeant, Union County Sheriff Office, in his/her individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff:
NAFIS AKEEM-ALIM ABDULLAH-MALIK, a/k/a Nafis A. Malik
Malik v. Medical Personel et al
as 5:2024ct03227
Defendant:
N.P. Ontiera, P.A. Tolson, Kimberly Grande and others
Plaintiff:
Nafis Akeem-Alim Abdullah Malik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nafis Abdullah-Malik v. Mecklenburg County Jail Administrator
as 22-6641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAFIS AKEEM-ALIM ABDULLAH-MALIK, a/k/a Akeem Abdullah Malik
Defendant / Appellee:
MECKLENBURG COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATOR, PARKER, Major, EDDIE CATHY, Sheriff and others
Abdullah-Malik v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Petitioner:
Nafis Akeem-Alim Abdullah-Malik
Respondent:
Mecklenburg County, Union County, Lincoln County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Malik et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Yaya Bilal, Talib LNU, Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik and others
Defendant:
FNU Parker, FNU LNU, FNU Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah-Malik v. Cathy et al
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik and Nafis Akeem-Alim Abdullah-Malik
Defendant:
Eddie Cathy, FNU Rogers, FNU Pursor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik v. Mecklenburg County Jail Administrator et al
as 3:2021cv00667
Plaintiff:
Akeem Alin-Nafis Abdullah-Malik and Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Jail Administrator, FNU Parker, Sheriff Eddie Cathy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
