Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ernster v. City of Mt. Washington, KY et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tamara Ernster
Defendant:
City of Mt. Washington, KY, Bradley Aubin, Mark Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nalley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00472
Plaintiff:
Amy Lynette Nalley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Nalley v. Global Payments Check Recovery Services, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00299
Defendant:
Global Payments Check Recovery Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nancy Nalley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nalley v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv00801
Plaintiff:
John E. Nalley, III
Defendant:
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
John E. Nalley, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Parks v. Williamson et al
as 6:2008cv00403
Petitioner:
Darrell James Parks
Respondent:
Troy Williamson, S Scott, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gross v. Unknown Director of the Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Gross, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Director of the Bureau of Prisons, Louis Milusmic, Unknown Designating Team and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kentuckiana Roofing, Inc. v. Stow et al
as 3:2007cv00534
Plaintiff:
Kentuckiana Roofing, Inc. and Kentuckiana Roofing, Inc.
Defendant:
James Richard Stow, Emanuel Nalley and Kentuckiana Complete Home Improvements & Contracting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
