Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Nam Ba Nguyen v. J. Molina et al
as 8:2022cv01456
Plaintiff:
Nam Ba Nguyen
Defendant:
J. Molina and B Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Proland Management
as 6:2022cv01378
Plaintiff:
Kum Nam Lee
Defendant:
Proland Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nam Ba Nguyen v. Kara L Cross et al
as 8:2022cv01343
Plaintiff:
Nguyen Nam Ba and Nam Ba Nguyen
Defendant:
Kara L Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Proland Management
as 6:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Kum Nam Lee
Defendant:
Proland Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antwone Stokes v. Kuhl et al
as 2:2021cv09517
Plaintiff:
Antwone Stokes
Defendant:
Office Kuhl, Unknown Last Name Sgt., Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rafael Martirosyan v. L.A.S.D. et al
as 2:2021cv07893
Plaintiff:
Rafael Martirosyan
Defendant:
L.A.S.D., MCJ Grievance Personnel, MCJ OSJ Jail Liason Squad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowdy v. Nam et al
as 3:2021cv05609
Plaintiff:
Vernon Dowdy
Defendant:
Registered Nurse(RN) Nam, Registered Nurse(RN) Frances and RN Patrick Guillien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larkin v. Stovall et al
as 3:2021cv00288
Defendant:
Arnold, Nam, Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Larrie M Larkin, Sr
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Yil Jo et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2020cv01377
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Mr. Eric Garceti, Proland Management and others
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo, Kum Nam Lee, Krystof Zawadzki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Young Yil Jo et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2020cv00307
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Mr. Eric Garceti, Proland Management and others
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo, Kum Nam Lee, Krystof Zawadzki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
