Cases 11 - 20 of 20
PROWSE, ET AL v. FAIR LAWN BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2010cv04746
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PROWSE and NANCY RAMIREZ
Defendant:
FAIR LAWN BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Dock McNeely v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 10-16796
Petitioner - Appellant:
DOCK MCNEELY
Respondent - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, S. M. SALINAS, MANESS and others
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 2:2010cv00716
Plaintiff:
Sherman Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Laurance Smith, John Renwick, Nancy Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nancy Ramirez v. Air Methods Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv00217
Defendant:
Air Methods Corporation and Does
Unknown:
William A Wright
Plaintiff:
Nancy Ramirez
Steve Badue v. Meegan, et al
as 10-15079
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVE BADUE
Respondent - Appellee:
MEEGAN, Superior Court Judge, REEVES, Deputy District Attorney and NANCY RAMIREZ, Deputy District Attorney
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 5:2009cv05533
Plaintiff:
Sherman Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Laurance Smith, John Renwick, Nancy Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Ramirez et al v. HSBA Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 3:2008cv02418
Plaintiff:
Nancy Ramirez and Petra Ramirez
Defendant:
HSBA Bank USA, N.A., Aztec Foreclosure Corporation, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McNeely v. Jones et al
as 2:2008cv02710
Plaintiff:
Dock McNeely
Defendant:
Mike - Jones, - Douglas, - Brezoe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
