Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Nano's Glass, Inc. v. J.E. Dunn Construction Company et al
as 3:2012cv00394
Defendant:
J.E. Dunn Construction Company and William Henry Agency, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Nano's Glass, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Nano's Glass, Inc. v. KIC Development, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00252
Defendant:
KIC Development, LLC and The Hanover Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Nano's Glass, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Advanced Nano Coatings, Inc., et al v. Joseph Hanafin, et al
as 10-20865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADVANCED NANO COATINGS, INCORPORATED, INTUMESCENTS ASSOCIATES GROUP and VADO AG
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH HANAFIN and JOTUN A/S
SPECS USA Corp. v. SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH et al
as 3:2010cv04250
Plaintiff:
SPECS USA Corp.
Defendant:
SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH and SPECS Surface Nano Analysis, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADVANCED NANO COATINGS, INC. et al v. Hanafin et al
as 4:2009cv01243
Defendant:
Joseph Hanafin, JOTUN A/S and PROMAT UK LIMITED
Plaintiff:
ADVANCED NANO COATINGS, INC., INTUMESCENTS ASSOCIATES GROUP and VADO AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED. Ramirez v Willy Bietak Productions, Inc.
as 7:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Arnaldo "Nano" Ramirez, Arnaldo "Nano" Ramirez and Arnaldo "Nano" Ramirez
Defendant:
Willy Bietak Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Turchi et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
as 2:2007cv07693
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth S. Turchi and Nano J. Turchi, Jr.
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Nano-Proprietary Inc v. Canon Inc, et al
as 07-50640
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
NANO-PROPRIETARY INC, a Texas corporation
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
CANON INC and CANON USA INC, a New York corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
