Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Parkin v. Naphcare, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mitchell Parkin
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeSean Baskin v. Sheriff, Fulton County Georgia, et al
as 23-14045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESEAN M. BASKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF, FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA, NAPHCARE, INC., HAYES-ARMSTRONG and others
DeSean Baskin v. Sheriff, Fulton County Georgia, et al
as 23-14043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESEAN M. BASKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK LABOTT, HAYES-ARMSTRONG, SAINT-SIREN and others
Baskin v. Labott et al
as 1:2023cv03799
Plaintiff:
DeSean M. Baskin
Defendant:
Patrick Labott, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantrell Dunsmore v. Wells et al
as 8:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
Denise Cantrell Dunsmore
Defendant:
Rick Wells, Kelly Zeitz, RN, Naphcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendall v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Harold Joseph Kendall
Defendant:
Fulton County, Georgia, Naphcare, Inc., Sheriff Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parkin v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02715
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mitchell Parkin
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Kurt Hoffman and Brian Meinberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Chronister
as 8:2022cv01496
Plaintiff:
Jessica Long
Defendant:
Chad Chronister, Naphcare, Inc. and Keith Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Watkins v. City of Covington, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04365
Plaintiff:
Warren Cortiss and Barbara Watkins
Defendant:
City of Covington, Georgia, Officer Kinsley Nichols, Officer Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Naphcare, Inc.
as 8:2021cv02279
Plaintiff:
Paul Flores
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
