Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson et al v. Yoon et al
as 1:2023cv02245
Plaintiff:
Tim Anderson, Megan Angers, Elizia Artis and others
Defendant:
Superintendent David Brown, City Of Chicago, John Doe Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Protesters in Support of Black Lives et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv06851
Defendant:
#18659 Levon London, #19896 R. A. Ayala, #351 Patricia Zuber and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Vail, Protesters in Support of Black Lives, Jeannine Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sklarsky et al v. Indigo Real Estate Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03680
Plaintiff:
Natalie Kenvin, Susan Cook and Laura Sklarsky
Defendant:
Standard Maple Owner, LLC, Apartment Management Consultants, LLC and Indigo Real Estate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07655
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01745
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
