Cases 21 - 30 of 891
Frodsham v. Rachas, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Natalie Frodsham
Defendant:
Rachas, Inc. doing business as Chuze Fitness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Velasco Vilchez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-456
Petitioner:
NATALY AURORA VELASCO VILCHEZ, GIANVICTOR IVAN ROMERO JUAREZ and MATEO VALENTINO ROMERO VELASCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Brook v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Natalie Brook
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rebeca Aplonia Gross et al v. Susanne S. Cho et al
as 5:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Apolonia Gross, Z. T. B. and L. R. R. W.
Defendant:
Susanne S. Cho, Natalie M.P. Lough, Elizabth E. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez et al v. Nienow et al
as 3:2023cv02338
Plaintiff:
Brenda Martinez, Pedro Bernal, A.B. and others
Defendant:
M.D. Shalon Nienow, M.D. Sarah Vega, M.D. Natalie Laub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Chocktoot et al v. Arden Glen Healthcare, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02992
Plaintiff:
Desiree Chocktoot, Darneece Veazey, Leslie Johnson and others
Defendant:
Arden Glen Healthcare, LLC, Riley Corbin and Natalie Law
United States of America v. Lazarte et al
as 3:2023cv06158
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Natalie Lazarte, Jason Lazarte, Pierce County and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Zeitlin v. Wetenhall
as 23-4035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ZEITLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
NATALIE M. WETENHALL
Simon, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3997
Petitioner:
ANNOVE SIMON, NATALIE JEAN and SOFIA SIMON-JEAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
