Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Antar v. Torres Shlatz et al
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Jessica C Torres Shlatz, State of Connecticut, William T. Cremins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Shackleford v. US Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2023cv01570
Plaintiff:
Dave D. Shackleford
Defendant:
US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Marcia L. Fudge, City of Stamford and others
Calhoun v. Uconn Health et al
as 3:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Christopher Calhoun
Defendant:
Uconn Health, Ersilda Ajce, Natalie J Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watert v. Ulthera, Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01917
Defendant:
Ulthera, Inc, Merz North America, Inc. and Merz, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Natalie Watert
Derose v. Cyr et al
as 3:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Natalie Derose
Defendant:
Anthony Cyr and Eassons Transport LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bastian et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2021cv01249
Plaintiff:
NATALIE BASTIAN, DOREEN BASTIAN, BRANFORD RIVER RESORT AND SPA LLC and others
Defendant:
NED LAMONT and DAVID LEHMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacon v. Universal Motors, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00889
Defendant:
Digital Federal Credit Union and Universal Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Natalie Bacon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Bastian et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2020cv00733
Plaintiff:
Branford River Spa and Resort, LLC, Doreen Bastian and Natalie Bastian
Defendant:
David Lehman and Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schlosser v. Carter et al
as 3:2020cv00434
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Department of Correction, Chelsea and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schlosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
