Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hood v. Asset Living et al
as 3:2023cv02328
Plaintiff:
Natalie Shanell Hood
Defendant:
Asset Living, Bianca Iris Morales and SWBC Professional Employer Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Felder v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Kevin Felder
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Mayor of Dallas, Dallas City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
N.H. et al v. Castilleja et al
as 4:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
N. H. and Nadine Depp
Defendant:
Natalie Castilleja, Matthew Marick and Denton County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodden et al v. Fauci et al
as 3:2021cv00317
Plaintiff:
James Rodden, Isaac McLaughlin, Gabriel Escoto and others
Defendant:
Dr. Anthony Fauci, Jeffrey Zients, Natalie Quillian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Isom v. Internal Affairs State of Texas et al
as 3:2021cv02192
Plaintiff:
Tyesha N Isom and Tyesha Natalie Isom
Defendant:
Internal Affairs State of Texas, Internal Affairs State of New York, Inernal Affairs State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. McKenzie
as 4:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
Lewis Brooks McKenzie
Defendant:
Kelli Marie McKenzie, Dawn King, Kelly Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
