Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Robert Michael v. CO II Dave Gordon
as 20-6445
Defendant / Appellee:
CO II DAVE GORDON, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex, DR. GARCIA, Wexford Health Services, Stevens Correctional Center, DR. LYE, Wexford Health Services (MOCC) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOGAN MICHAEL
Michael v. Gordon et al
as 2:2017cv04314
Plaintiff:
Robert Logan Michael
Defendant:
Dave Gordon, Nate Kendrick, David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael v. Gordon et al
as 1:2017cv04314
Plaintiff:
Robert Logan Michael
Defendant:
Dave Gordon, Nate Kendrick, David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Blake v. Lisa Frye
as 11-7240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH BLAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA FRYE, BE MORE, Rec., NATE KENDRICK, Corporal, CO and others
LoBello v. Kendrick et al
as 2:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
Salvatore LoBello
Defendant:
Nate Kendrick and Dave Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Frye et al
as 2:2010cv01320
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
Lisa R. Frye, Be More, Nate Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dalton v. W.Va. Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00214
Plaintiff:
1 Starr Dalton
Defendant:
W.Va. Division of Corrections, David Ballard, Jim Rubenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liebau v. Ballard et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
William Liebau
Defendant:
David Ballard, Nate Kendrick, Russell Matheny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Maze et al
as 2:2009cv01153
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
Price Maze, David Miller, Nate Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
1Starr Dalton v. WV Division of Corrections
as 09-7693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
1STARR DALTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, DAVID BALLARD, Warden, JIM RUBENSTEIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
