Cases 71 - 80 of 300
Williams v. State of Georgia et al
as 6:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Grady Renard Williams, Jr. and Reginald Charles Harvey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Nathan Deal, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Lones et al
as 6:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Earnest B. Clayton
Defendant:
Laurel L. Lones, FNU Pearson, Stanley Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv01083
Plaintiff:
Willie G. Smith
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Robyn A. Crittenden and Virginia Ginger Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green et al v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv01040
Plaintiff:
Janel Green and Mary Margaret Oliver
Defendant:
Nathan Deal , Steve Stancil and Jamiel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARNER v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GARNER
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON , WALTER BERRY , GREGORY DOZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIES v. DEAL et al
as 5:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT DAVIES
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, GREGORY DOZIER, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Bobbitt et al
as 6:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Earnest Clayton
Defendant:
Trezonza Bobbitt, Harold Caravillio, Harold Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift Bey v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv00906
Plaintiff:
Blaane Marco Swift Bey
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Christopher M. Carr, Richard T. Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 5:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON GRAY
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, HOUSTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK, GEORGE HARTWIG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 5:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON GRAY
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, HOUSTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK, GEORGE HARTWIG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
