Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Annamalai v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Annamalia Annamalai
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USA, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gary v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
James L. Gary
Defendant:
USA, Kathy Hill, Dan Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akers v. Simpkins
as 3:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:
Nathan Simpkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Annamalai v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv02579
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Daniel Sproul, Nathan Simpkins, Annabell Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. Simpkins et al
as 3:2022cv02576
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Nathan Simpkins, Gary Burgess, Daniel Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv02469
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Dan Sproul, A. McCaffery, G. Soza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akers v. Chen et al
as 5:2022cv05555
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Edward Chen, Kathy S Hill, Katherine N Siereveld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Simpkins
as 3:2022cv02192
Petitioner:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:
Nathan Simpkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Christy v. Marion USP
as 3:2022cv02044
Plaintiff:
Shawn Christy
Defendant:
Marion USP, Daniel Sproul, John LeClair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Simmons et al
as 3:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Jason Simmons, Jamie Conover, Kathy S. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
