Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Brown et al v. The University of Phoenix, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02840
Plaintiff:
Felton Brown, Sophia Edwards, Peter Enzinger and others
Defendant:
The University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Education Group, Inc.
Porter #129599 v. Washington et al
as 1:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Porter #129599 and Nathaniel K. Owuso
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Unknown Boatman and Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30915
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL PORTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
N. Owusu v. MDOC Pain Mgmt Comm, et al
as 20-1217
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL P. MILLETTE, TERESA MERLING, COREY GRAHN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
N. KALONJI OWUSU, aka Nathaniel Porter
Henderson et al v. US Roof Recycle, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01428
Plaintiff:
Joshua Henderson , Rodney Randolph and Nathaniel Porter
Defendant:
US Roof Recycle, LLC and Johann Bowman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nathaniel Porter v. Unknown Party, et al
as 12-1908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL PORTER, aka N. Kalonji Owusu
Defendant - Appellee:
RHONDA ROBERTSON, in her individual capacity and JAMES VANTATENHOVE, aka Unknown Vantatenhove
Defendant:
CAROLYN GREEN-CHANEY, aka C. Green and UNKNOWN PARTY, named as "IBC Mailroom Supervisor", in his individual capacity
Nathaniel Porter v. Haresh Pandy, et al
as 10-2182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL PORTER
Defendant - Appellee:
HARESH B. PANDY, JEFFREY STIEVE, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director and others
Nathaniel Porter v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 10-1203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL PORTER, aka N. Kalonji Owusu, I
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO
Porter #129599 v. Unknown Party et al
as 1:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Porter #129599
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Vantatenhove and Rhonda Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
