Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Nathaniel Wallace v. Warren L. Montgomery
as 2:2024cv01616
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Wallace
Respondent:
Warren L Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Montgomery
as 3:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Wallace
Respondent:
Warren L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv06047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wallace v. Humphreys
as 1:2015cv00687
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Wallace
Respondent:
Robert Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Board of Prison Hearings
as 2:2013cv02648
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Wallace
Respondent:
Board of Prison Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Board of Prison Hearings
as 1:2014cv00058
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Wallace
Respondent:
Board of Prison Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Mabry et al
as 8:2012cv03693
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Wallace
Defendant:
Regina Mabry and Washington Area Metro Transit Authority
Cross_claimant:
Washington Area Metro Transit Authority and Regina Mabry
Cross_defendant:
Regina Mabry and Washington Area Metro Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Wallace v. Cates et al
as 3:2012cv01442
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Wallace
Respondent:
Matthew Cates , L.A. County Clerk's Office and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Cates et al
as 1:2012cv00908
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Wallace
Respondent:
Matthew Cates, L.A. County Clerk's Office and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nathaniel Wallace v. CDCR et al
as 2:2011cv10055
Respondent:
CCI, CDCR and L A County Court Dept of Justice
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Wallace
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
