Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Washington, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
James Nathaniel Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Polaris Experience, LLC v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Polaris Experience, LLC doing business as Polaris Adventures
Counter Claimant:
Nathaniel Washington and WMS Auto Sales, LLC
Defendant:
Washington Management Services LLC, Atlanta Slingshot Adventure Rentals LLC, Georgia Slingshot Adventure Rentals LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Polaris Experience, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Washington, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00486
Plaintiff:
James Nathaniel Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WASHINGTON JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73530
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WASHINGTON JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chattahooche Shoals Investment Group, LLC v. Jackson
as 1:2019cv00033
Plaintiff:
Chattahooche Shoals Investment Group, LLC
Defendant:
Samuel D. Jackson and Nathaniel Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duru v. State of Georgia
as 1:2015cv02815
Defendant:
Mrs Kerry Kohnen, TSPMG The Southern Permanente Medical Group Georgia, Cobb County Government and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Adanma Duru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Washington v. Warden, Lowell CI, et al
as 15-10798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NATHANIEL WASHINGTON, a.k.a. Christopher Nathaniel ElBey Washington
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, LOWELL CI and JOYCELYN CATWELL
Washington v. Doe et al
as 5:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
John-Jane Doe and Joycelyn Catwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
