Cases 71 - 80 of 84
National City Mortgage Company v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2007cv02114
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Miguel A. Ramirez and Maria R. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
National City Mortgage Company v. Stephen et al
as 3:2007cv02070
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Brian Stephen and Elaine K. Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
National City Mortgage Company v. Diaz
as 3:2007cv01992
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Luis G. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02190
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at00963
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
National City Mortgage Company v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2007cv01705
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Scott R. Gilbert and Tammy J. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
National City Mortgage Company v. Wright et al
as 1:2007cv01416
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
John L Wright and Lisa M Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
National City Mortgage Company v. Edgewater Lending Group, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00250
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Edgewater Lending Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
