Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Vincent v. National Debt Relief LLC
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Gilda Vincent
Defendant:
National Debt Relief LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
National Debt Relief, LLC v. Season 4, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv07198
Plaintiff:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Defendant:
Season 4, LLC and Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Schopp v. National Debt Relief, LLC
as 4:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
George Kenneth Schopp
Defendant:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tijerina v. National Debt Relief, LLC
as 5:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
Adam Tijerina
Defendant:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rojas v. Cordoba Legal Group LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03264
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Cordoba Legal Group LLC, National Debt Relief LLC, Alfredo Cordoba and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
