Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Junior Galette v. Roger Goodell, et al
as 23-10896
Plaintiff / Appellant: JUNIOR GALETTE
Defendant / Appellee: ROGER GOODELL, SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, LOS ANGELES RAMS and others
Porter v. League Players Association We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv13651
Defendant: National Football League Players Association
Plaintiff: Vincent Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Players1st Sports Management Group - SMG et al v. National Football League et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv12295
Plaintiff: Players1st Sports Management Group - SMG and James Dickey
Defendant: National Football League, National Football League Management Council and National Football League Players Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ronald Brown, et al v. NFL Players Incorporated, et al
as 12-56912
Plaintiff - Appellee: RONALD BROWN, CHARLES DETWILER and DWIGHT HICKS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, a Virginia corporation def and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS INCORPORATED, a Virginia corporation, DBA NFL Players
Ronald Brown, et al v. NFL Players Association, et al
as 12-56843
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD BROWN, CHARLES DETWILER and DWIGHT HICKS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, a Virginia corporation def and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS INCORPORATED, a Virginia corporation, NFL Players
Ronald Brown et al v. National Football League Players Association et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv01953
Plaintiff: Ronald Brown, Charles Detwiler and Dwight Hicks
Defendant: National Football League Players Association and National Football League Players Incorporated
DeLamielluere v. National Football League, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06923
Plaintiff: Joe DeLamielluere
Defendant: National Football League, Inc., National Football League Players Association, National Football League Players Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv01967
Not Classified By Court: SEC, Non-Party XOS Technologies, Inc., The Big Ten Conference, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Samuel Jacobson, Danny Wimprine, Craig Newsome and others
Interested Party: Timothy J McIlwain, Pac-12 Conference, James E. Delany and others
Amicus Curiae: A&E Television Networks, LLC, James Brown, First Amendment Coalition and others
Plaintiff: Michael E. Davis, Michael Anderson, Samuel Michael Keller and others
Intervenor: Ramzi Yusef, Edward Breivik, James E. Holmes and others
Petitioner: Nicholas Kindler
Defendant: Collegiate Licensing Company, National Collegiate Athletic Association and Electronic Arts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bernard Parrish, et al v. National Football League Playe, et al
as 09-15226
Plaintiff - Appellee: BERNARD PAUL PARRISH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, HERBERT ANTHONY ADDERLY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and WALTER ROBERTS, III
Defendant - Appellant: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, a Virginia Corporation and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS INC., a Virginia Corporation, DBA Players Inc.
Bernard Parrish, et al v. National Football League Playe, et al
as 08-17327
Plaintiff - Appellee: BERNARD PAUL PARRISH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, HERBERT ANTHONY ADDERLY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and WALTER ROBERTS, III
Defendant: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS INC., a Virginia Corporation, DBA Players Inc. and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, a Virginia Corporation
Third-party-defendant - Appellant: ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?