Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Carter v. Younger et al
as 1:2016cv01320
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Carter
Defendant:
William Douglas-Lee Younger and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION d/b/a AMTRAK
as 2:2015cv13020
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION d/b/a AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Skeen v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv11110
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
Bernice Skeen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. Amtrak National Railroad
as 2:2014cv02733
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bryant
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tiffany Patterson v. AMTRAK
as 14-1078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIFFANY PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, dba Amtrak
Washington v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2013cv02635
Plaintiff:
Maude Washington
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Mullinger et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2013cv01438
Plaintiff:
Brianna Mullinger and Teri Mullinger
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Ted W. Drury, Gary Grann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Menzie v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv14851
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) and Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Frances Menzie and Lovelle Menzie
Bondie v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2012cv01032
Plaintiff:
Wilma Bondie
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Robinson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2012cv00813
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and John W. Martin Co. & Associates, L.P.A.
Plaintiff:
Julia Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
