Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bradley v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak
as 1:2023cv15177
Plaintiff:
Lisa Bradley
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Miller v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
Patrick Miller
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SANDERS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2019cv02445
Plaintiff:
TORRENCE SANDERS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
HAMILTON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2019cv01986
Plaintiff:
heather hamilton
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Jackson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2019cv11371
Not Yet Classified:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jackson
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Maristela v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv02498
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 10, National Raildroad Passenger Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Andrew Maristela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm
NELSON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv13037
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JERALD NELSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Karen Shannon v. National Railroad Passenger Co
as 18-13149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN SHANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d.b.a. AMTRAK
SHANNON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2017cv23314
Plaintiff:
KAREN SHANNON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Kathy Vance v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 5:2016cv00271
Defendant:
Does and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kathy Vance
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
