Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 58
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Pekin Insurance Company et al
as 1:2015cv07269
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Defendant: Pekin Insurance Company and Frank H. Gill Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al v. CASCO SECOND STREET, LLC
as 1:2015cv01020
Plaintiff: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and WASHINGTON TERMINAL COMPANY
Defendant: CASCO SECOND STREET, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Borovac v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2015cv00196
Plaintiff: Paul Borovac
Defendant: Conexis Benefits Administrators, LP and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Type: Contract Insurance
National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2015cv04122
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Chicago Union Station Company
Defendant: City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ZAYO GROUP, LLC v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00677
Plaintiff: ZAYO GROUP, LLC
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION , JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN and ELEANOR D. ACHESON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2014cv09434
Plaintiff: James W Black
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Orleans City et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2014cv02232
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff: New Orleans City and New Orleans Building Corporation
Counter_claimant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Counter_defendant: New Orleans Building Corporation and New Orleans City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv07510
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08244 (Companies), Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08242, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08241 and others
Defendant: Torus Specialty Insurance Company, Commonwealth Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
Type: Contract Insurance
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv01369
Plaintiff: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Defendant: ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds et al v. National RailRoad Passenger Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv04717
Counter Defendant: AG De 1830 Compagnie Belge D'Assurances Generales Incendie Accidents Et Risques Divers SA, Accident & Casualty Co., Accident & Casualty Insurance Company Of Winterthur and others
Plaintiff: AG De 1830 Compagnie Belge D'Assurances Generales Incendie Accidents Et Risques Divers SA, Accident & Casualty Co., Accident & Casualty Insurance Company Of Winterthur and others
Cross Defendant: Allianz Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company and others
Defendant: Allianz Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company and others
Counter Claimant: National RailRoad Passenger Corporation
Cross Claimant: National RailRoad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?