Cases 21 - 28 of 28
v. CITY OF MERCED et al
as 1:2019at00615
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION dba AMTRAK, COUNTY OF MERCED, CITY OF MERCED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Inez Tarver v. National Railroad Passenger Co, et al
as 19-55647
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, DBA Amtrak, PAMELA KEYES, JORGE RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INEZ SUNTA TARVER
Williams v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv00576
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation dba Amtrak, Union Pacific Railroad Company, County of Contra Costa and others
Plaintiff:
Monique Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Doe, et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 19-15074
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION and CAREMARK RX, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CAREMARK CALIFORNIA SPECIALTY PHARMACY, LLC, CAREMARK, LLC, TIME WARNER, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE, Two, JOHN DOE, Four; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JOHN DOE, Three and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, Five
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01561
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jamison Sorensen v. National Railroad Passenger Co, et al
as 17-56611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMISON SORENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, DBA Amtrak, RITA CROZIER and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Nathaniel Deboles, et al v. National Railroad Passenger Co, et al
as 14-15651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL D. DEBOLES and MARY DEBOLES
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, DBA Amtrak and BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
menin v. national railroad passenger corporation dba amtrak
as 1:2013at00447
Plaintiff:
ronnie r menin
Defendant:
national railroad passenger corporation dba amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
