Cases 1 - 10 of 39
United States for the Use and Benefit of Herc Rentals, Inc. v. Ecostructive LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10358
Plaintiff:
United States for the Use and Benefit of Herc Rentals, Inc.
Defendant:
Ecostructive LLC, CTA Construction Company, Inc., CTA Construction Managers, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv12373
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and CTA Construction Managers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Thornton v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Keltoma Thornton
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hawley et al v. Harleysville Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv11474
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Harleysville Insurance Company and Nationwide
Plaintiff:
Robert Hawley and Linda Hawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Burns et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv30071
Plaintiff:
Brendan Burns and Nerissa Bardfeld
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Trident Building Systems Inc. v. CTA Construction Managers, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv11218
Plaintiff:
United States of America For The Use And Benefit of Trident Building Systems Inc.
Defendant:
CTA Construction Managers, LLC, CTA Construction Company, Inc. and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America. v. Trident Building Systems Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10086
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Kingspan Insulated Panels, Inc. doing business as Kingspan - ASI
Defendant:
Trident Building Systems Inc., Trident Building Systems LLC, CTA Construction Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
United States of America for the use of Gaspard & Morgan Construction LLC d/b/a Restoration Roofing v. Best Choice Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use of Gaspard & Morgan Construction LLC d/b/a Restoration Roofing and United States of America on behalf of and for the use and benefit of Gaspard & Morgan Construction, LLC doing business as Restoration Roofing
Defendant:
Best Choice Construction, LLC and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Torres-Ronda, et al v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., et al
as 20-1089
Defendant:
CARLOS CONTRERAS-APONTE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Public Works, JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, QBE SEGUROS, f/k/a Optima Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NOEMI TORRES-RONDA and ANGELO RIVERA-LAMBOY
Petitioner:
PR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS and OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF PUERTO RICO
Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AIG INSURANCE COMPANY - PUERTO RICO, f/k/a Chartis Insurance Company of Puerto Rico and ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO.
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Torres-Ronda, et al v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., et al
as 20-1038
Defendant:
CARLOS CONTRERAS-APONTE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Public Works, GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, FRANCISCO PARES ALICEA, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Treasury of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, QBE SEGUROS, f/k/a Optima Insurance Company, CARIBBEAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, f/k/a Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELO RIVERA-LAMBOY and NOEMI TORRES-RONDA
Petitioner:
PR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS and OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF PUERTO RICO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
